{"id":1478,"date":"2026-07-21T20:13:21","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T20:13:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/modernhomejournals.com\/?p=1478"},"modified":"2026-07-21T20:13:21","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T20:13:21","slug":"federal-appeals-court-upholds-peter-navarros-criminal-conviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/modernhomejournals.com\/?p=1478","title":{"rendered":"Federal Appeals Court Upholds Peter Navarro\u2019s Criminal Conviction"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n

A D.C. federal appeals court on Tuesday unanimously the criminal conviction of Peter Navarro, one of President Donald Trump\u2019s top trade advisers, after he refused to testify in front of Congress and provide documents in connection to a Jan. 6 probe.<\/p>

Read more Software Glitch Put Thousands of Noncitizens on New Jersey Voter Rolls<\/a><\/p>

Congress subpoenaed Navarro because of claims he wrote in a 2021 book describing his plan to \u201cleverage\u201d then-Vice President Mike Pence\u2019s authority to delay certification of the results of the 2020 presidential election. The Trump adviser defied those orders. A jury convicted Navarro of two counts of contempt of Congress in 2023, and the Justice Department later sentenced<\/u><\/span> him to four months in prison.<\/p>\n

Navarro and longtime ally Steve Bannon are two of the only Trump advisers to be criminally charged and serve prison time following the president\u2019s attempts to undermine the 2020 election results and the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Bannon was convicted for criminal contempt of Congress in July 2022 and served four months in prison, though the Supreme Court later vacated<\/u><\/span> his conviction.<\/p>

Navarro appealed his conviction in January 2024, alleging Trump invoked executive privilege \u2014 a statute that defines the president\u2019s authority to withhold documents and information. Executive privilege applies to the president\u2019s top advisers, but the protection has substantial limits and is not issued automatically. The adviser\u2019s communication must be directly tied to presidential decisions, and it does not shield information in criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\nTrending<\/span>\n<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n